In any Rochester medical malpractice case, there will likely be motions presented by either party, which the court will hear and rule upon. When the court issues a ruling on a contested matter it defines the law of the case, and absent new evidence, all parties must abide by the…
Rochester Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Lawyer Blog
New York Court Discusses Res Ipsa Loquitor in a Gynecologic Malpractice Case
As gynecologic malpractice cases involve complex facts and issues that are typically beyond the understanding of the average person, most medical malpractice cases rely on experts to prove liability. In some cases, however, gynecologic malpractice is so clear that expert opinions may not be necessary. Rather, the plaintiff will rely…
New York Court Discusses Grounds for Granting Reargument on a Motion for Summary in Failure to Diagnose Case
Patients rely on doctors to provide adequate care, which includes properly diagnosing any injury or illness. If a doctor fails to diagnose a medical issue in a timely manner it can result in significant harm or even death and may be grounds for a medical malpractice action. In weighing whether…
New York Court Discusses Standard for Granting Judgment as a Matter of Law in Medical Malpractice Cases
In cases involving obstetric malpractice, a plaintiff will typically exercise her right to a trial by jury. A jury trial allows a panel of the plaintiff’s peers, rather than a judge, to assess whether the defendant caused the plaintiff to suffer harm and if so, what damages the plaintiff should…
New York Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Lack of Informed Consent Claims
All civil claims have a statute of limitations under which the injured party must pursue his or her claim. The statute of limitations for your claim depends on the nature of the harm alleged. In cases involving surgical malpractice, if the plaintiff sets forth claims of both intentional tort and…
Court Discusses Grounds for Dismissing New York Medical Malpractice Cases
In many medical malpractice cases, there is more than one medical care provider that may be liable for causing the plaintiff harm. Unfortunately, in some cases, the court will dismiss a person’s medical malpractice case in its entirety if the defendant physicians offer sufficient proof that they did not deviate…
Court Rejects Agreement Limiting the Right to Pursue a Medical Malpractice Claim in a New York Case
People enter into contracts every day, including contracts promising not to sue in the event of harm. While a contract that is entered into voluntarily will typically be upheld by the court if a contract violates public policy it may be deemed unenforceable. This was illustrated in a recent case decided…
New York Court Affirms Verdict for Defendant in a Medical Malpractice Case Following a Failure to Diagnose
In many cases in which a plaintiff alleges he or she suffered harm due to a delayed diagnosis, whether a defendant is found liable for medical malpractice hinges on the testimony of each party’s expert witness. In most cases, a court will not disturb a jury’s verdict, unless the evidence…
New York Court Discusses Factors Permitting Late Notice of a Medical Malpractice Claim Against a Public Corporation
The statute of limitations for pursuing a medical malpractice claim in New York is two years and six months from the date of harm. In cases where the medical care provider is a public corporation, however, different notice requirements apply. The appellate division of the Supreme Court of New York…
New York Court Finds No Error In Verdict Sheet in Medical Malpractice Case
In a medical malpractice case, it is essential to set forth every manner in which malpractice was allegedly committed, and present evidence of the malpractice in a clear manner at trial. A plaintiff’s failure to provide sufficiently present evidence of malpractice can result in verdict sheets that do not adequately…